2 years for a trial against neighbours from hell

We spent our morning at the Crown Office today, meticulously going over evidence files and reviewing everything before we have to testify at our Neighbour From Hell’s trial. We made sure every T was crossed and every I was dotted. Now that it’s all public record, it’s beyond satisfying to finally vent about this publicly after 2 years in the process!

We had a mountain of video footage to dissect, countless screenshots she flaunted online, and endless text messages she bombarded my girlfriend with. Not only did it take a lot of time to go through, but it also unleashed a storm of anxiety, forcing us to relive those tormenting moments by sifting through the videos and images.

I didn’t realize we had an overwhelming avalanche of evidence against her, including that damning RCMP video we didn’t even know existed. It’s mind-blowing—and infuriating—why she would brazenly deny everything by pleading innocent. Now, this whole mess has to drag through a trial.

We’re still wasting our time after 2 years of this mess

It’s absurd how much time we squander on her instead of living our own lives. She’s like a succubus, sucking the life out of us before we can even scream for help. Instead of owning up to her guilt and likely facing group sessions and a no-contact order, she’s rolling the dice on jail time by opting for a trial.

It’s laughable that her defence hinges on a few satirical stories our moderators posted way back that she delusionally assumed were 100% about her. She’s flirting with jail time based on mere speculation. None of those posts contained her name, address, or even a single image. Honestly, it could have been about Thelma from the Scooby Doo cartoon show, considering there’s zero evidence pointing to her. If she saw herself in those posts, it was purely a figment of her imagination and purely coincidental.

We may publish all the evidence after the trial and sentencing just to expose the absurdity of it all. Brace yourself for an epic facepalm moment when you see the overwhelming proof and her laughable attempts to deny it.

The Charges That Were Upheld but Should Have Been More Severe

So she’s finally on trial for 4 measly charges—seriously, just 4? Clearly, there should be a hell of a lot more, but hey, that’s our so-called justice system for you, right? Not to blame the hard-working people and officers, it’s the system that’s broken.

CC (810)(1) – Where injury or damage feared:
This section allows for anyone who fears reasonable grounds of personal injury or property damage to lay information before a justice.
810(1) An information may be laid before a justice by or on behalf of any person who fears on reasonable grounds that another person will cause personal injury to him or her or to his or her spouse or common-law partner or child or will damage his or her property.

CC (266)(b) – Everyone who commits an assault is guilty of…
Everyone who commits an assault is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or (b) an offence punishable by summary conviction.

CC (430)(4)(b) – Mischief (equivalent to US destruction of property laws):
430(4) Everyone who commits mischief in relation to property, other than property described in subsection (3), (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

CC (145)(4)(a) – Failure to comply with a summons:
145(4) Everyone who is served with a summons and who fails, without lawful excuse, the proof of which lies on him, to appear at a time and place stated therein, if any, for the purposes of the Identification of Criminals Act or to attend court in accordance therewith, is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years. (Yes even flipping somebody the bird you’re not supposed to communicate directly or indirectly with (Obscene hand gesture) is in breach of your undertaking.)

Denying what’s real and believing what is not there.

This is as absurd as a Flat Earther venturing into space, seeing the Earth as a sphere, and stubbornly insisting it’s flat. Despite the mountain of evidence against her, she’s ridiculously denying it ever happened. From what I hear, if you plead not guilty and waste the court’s time, you’re not just getting a slap on the wrist. According to CC(145)(4)(a), you’re headed straight to jail without passing go. So, what flat planet is she even living on?

And the Saga Continues…

As this circus of a trial unfolds, it’s a constant reminder of how the justice system can sometimes feel more like a bad joke than a system of order. Watching her deny reality while we cascade through mountains of undeniable evidence is beyond frustrating—it’s infuriating.

It’s not just a matter of seeking justice anymore; it’s a glimpse into the absurd lengths some people will go to dodge consequences. As we brace ourselves for what’s ahead, all we can hope for is that reason prevails, and justice is served. Because at the end of the day, we’ve all sacrificed too much time, energy, and sanity dealing with our Neighbour From Hell.

Have you ever been in a similar situation? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below. We’d love to hear your stories and how you navigated through the nightmare of dealing with an impossible neighbour.